Talk:Sakura

Is there an objection if I'll write in Trivia that she's a nonmonogamous, polyamorous person?
 * Doesn't need to be on trivia, is already in personality and in bio. Her statement is the only proof of it we possess as of now, and it remained quite nebolous.Oilgof (talk) 16:44, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Nebolous? In this manga the female protagonist is making sexual innuendos all the time+the president of the art club is a high school student who draw herself naked for exhibitions and walks around naked in school+Did you take a look at Nanashi's hentai mangas? It's obvious what the author meant when he wrote that monologue to Sakura. The character can’t finish her monologue probably because of some kind of weird Japanese censorship. Is there an objection to replace what's written at the top of her page to what she say at chapter 104, pages 4 and 5?
 * First of all Nanashi having started his career with hentai doesn't mean all of his content are sexual related, it's normal for Japanese ecchi manga to have those kind of contents, especially school-related. The sexual content was even stronger in GTO despite Toru Fugisawa not being a former hentai artist, and surely in its wiki the admins doesn't spend half their time removing sexual-themed vandalism, so YES, big objection, it will just open a Pandora's box: every sex-related joke will be taken as the absolute truth making every character promiscuous because of some fanservice, and for what? A character making sexual innuendos doesn't make her or him polyamorous, Sakura treat most of her relationships light-heartedly (the game club, Senpai's friend, those two guys she mentioned) referring to them as "friends", not lovers, search the dialogue of chapter 104 in the Japanese scan "since we're all friends anyway"; she use 友達 (tomodachi) meaning friend, and is not the first time in the manga in which she showed an hippy-alike mindset (Chapter 37: "mankind are all brothers and sisters and should all make up and have fun"), according to Nagatoro in Chapter 58 she "let them (boys) pitch but never let them score" in Kyoto she went to Toei Studio Park with Senpai's friends saying them she was in their care, is it a proof that sh's a polyamorous person? No, she just like to "be pampered" as it was written in the Official Fanbook. Nanashi's work is now way more vanilla and has downplayed most of the strong/violent/explicit contents that previously permeated his work, it doesn't have anything to do with "some sort of Japanese censorship", the legacy of manga like Honoka or similar are half the reason he's so secretive regarding his personal life, so please don't stop at the sexual subtext as in "Nanashi used to be an hentai artist so it obviously like that".
 * Also, the President being exibitionist (which we explained in the trivia section on the character page not to be the case, by the way) what does it has to do with Sakura's attitude with guys?Oilgof (talk) 08:07, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

A high school student being exhibitionist is just another example to the sexual nature of the writing. obviously Nanashi's art and writing are much less sexual in this manga, as it is aimed at a younger audience than the audience that consume his Hantai mangas, and still it's quite sexual. The relationship between the male and female protagonists of the story, began with the female protagonist taking advantage of the male protagonist's sexuality to harass him(And so is the connection between the male protagonist and all of the supporting characters except for the art club president). Once a hentai writer, always a hentai writer. This has nothing to do with other non-hentai writers like Toru Fugisawa. Sakura's words and actions don't match. At chapter 70 she kissed and had at least oral sex with a guy, who didn't know her well. it's clear she didn't take it seriously. She got together with her ex's best friend right after she dumped her ex, and it's clear she's not taking this seriously either, that's why she called her ex-boyfriend and his best friend her "friends" instead of lovers. Her actions shows that she's promiscuous and don't take relationships or sex seriously. I understand the real reason you're opposing. The changes may make you work a lot more to moderate this wiki, and you're not being paid to do this work. I'll drop it.